"AI Governance Trends: How Regulation, Collaboration and Skills Demand are Shaping the Industry"

" AI Governance Trends: How Regulation, Collaboration and Skills Demand are Shaping the Industry \r\n \r\n\r\nArtificial intelligence (AI) is transforming industries across the board as leaders recognize the technology's potential to improve productivity, enhance creativity, boost quality, and generate new solutions. This has created a surge in demand for AI, and in particular,\u00a0 generative AI .\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n Unlocking the value \u00a0of generative AI with responsible transformation can be a game-changer. Generative AI use cases can be found in various industries, from inspiring new designs in the furniture industry and personalizing marketing to accelerating drug discovery in the pharmaceutical industry.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nHowever, along with AI's potential value, leaders are also concerned about its risks, including bias, safety, security, and loss of reputation if something goes wrong.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nMany leaders also acknowledge that mitigating these risks can lead to a competitive advantage and fundamentally contribute to their organization\u2019s success. Therefore, adopting the technology ethically and responsibly has become a key consideration, leading to the rapid emergence and adoption of AI governance.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n AI regulation is here and expanding \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nAI is already subject to applicable regulations that focus on more than just the technology itself. For example, laws focus on privacy, anti-discrimination, liability, and product safety. In addition, AI-focused regulatory activity is expanding.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nIn 2024, the\u00a0 European Union\u2019s Artificial Intelligence Act , or EU AI Act, was finally passed into law after years of debate and anticipation. Like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we expect it to influence many similar laws in other regions of the world.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nAI has been discussed by policymakers worldwide and was\u00a0 mentioned \u00a0in legislative proceedings twice as frequently in 2023 as in 2022. In some cases, regulatory activity is explicitly focused on generative AI, such as\u00a0 China\u2019s Interim Administrative Measures for Generative Artificial Intelligence Services .\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nThere has also been an increase in AI-related standards activities and cross-jurisdictional collaboration, exemplified by initiatives driven by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), and the Group of Seven (G7).\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nIn 2024, we saw an increased focus on AI safety with the launch of new AI safety institutes and the expansion of efforts driven by institutes in the US, the UK, Singapore, and Japan. Also, the new\u00a0 EU AI Office , established under the EU AI Act, will focus on developing best practices.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nWe can expect this growth in the volume and variety of AI regulations and standards to continue for the foreseeable future as policymakers grapple with how to manage AI risks. International agreements on interoperable standards and baseline regulatory requirements will play an important part in enabling innovation and improving AI safety.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n AI self-governance will require both organizational and technical controls \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nMany organizations choose to adopt self-governance approaches to further drive alignment with their organizational values and build eminence.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nIn fact, implementing an organization\u2019s principles often involves meeting ethical standards that extend beyond regulatory requirements. Organizations may choose to leverage voluntary methods and frameworks such as the US NIST\u2019s\u00a0 AI Risk Management Framework , Singapore\u2019s\u00a0 AI Verify \u00a0framework and toolkit, and the UK\u2019s AI Safety Institute open-sourced\u00a0 Inspect \u00a0AI safety testing platform.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nSelf-governance of AI systems will involve both organizational and, increasingly, automated technical controls. AI requires strong organizational management systems with controls like those described in the\u00a0 ISO\/IEC 42001 international standard.\r\n\r\nTechnical controls are equally important as socio-technical systems. Automation can often help them, for example, through automation in\u00a0 AI red teaming \u00a0(a structured way of testing AI models to identify issues and help protect against harmful behaviours or outcomes), metadata identification, logging, monitoring, and alerts.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nAutomation will be needed as the technology reaches speeds and intelligence that require real-time controls. Furthermore, as harmonized standards and technical AI safety controls advance, many organizations will embrace them.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nHuman and AI collaboration will remain important. For instance, IBM has implemented organizational controls through its\u00a0 AI Ethics Board \u00a0and\u00a0 Integrated Governance Program \u00a0and offers solutions to help clients implement organizational and technical controls such as\u00a0 watsonx.governance .\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n AI governance trends to watch Image:\u00a0IBM \r\n \r\n A growing need for skilled AI professionals \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nAs the AI governance market continues to expand rapidly, skilled AI professionals who can implement responsible organizational and technical controls will be in high demand.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nThe playing field will range from existing technology leaders to new start-ups focused almost exclusively on AI governance solutions such as AI inventory management, policy management and reporting.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nThe market will evolve to support specialized areas such as incident management, red-teaming, conformity assessments, transparency reporting and technical documentation. As this occurs, the number of trained AI governance professionals will need to grow to support it.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nThese professionals will need training to perform tasks specific to market demands, including tasks required by regulations. Education and certification programmes will play a critical role. In fact, we have already seen new certification options appear, such as the International Association of Privacy Professionals'\u00a0 Artificial Intelligence Governance Professional \u00a0certification.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nWhile costs are associated with training professionals and implementing AI ethics and governance practices more broadly, the costs of not doing these things can be even higher.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nOrganizations can leverage a holistic\u00a0 approach \u00a0to evaluating return on investment by examining not just traditional returns but also the returns gained through reputational impact and the possibility of building new organizational capabilities.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nLeaders should ensure they view AI governance from a\u00a0 value generation \u00a0perspective and not purely one of risk avoidance.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n The path forward is open and collaborative \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nAI is changing and enabling the way humans work and live, providing unprecedented benefits to individuals, organizations and society.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nScaling AI requires skilled individuals and often will need automation to support responsible adoption. These professionals can also support the growing need for effective regulatory compliance and self-governance.\r\n\r\n "

"AI Governance Trends: How Regulation, Collaboration and Skills Demand are Shaping the Industry"

Majority of Banks Impacted by DDEP Meet Recapitalisation Targets, IMF SaysAMP

Club World Cup Offers Valuable Insights Ahead of 2026 World CupAMP

WAFCON: Do or Die Affair As Ghana Take on TanzaniaAMP