"Ben Boakye Urges President Mahama to Review MIIF Structure and Policies"

" Ben Boakye Urges President Mahama to Review MIIF Structure and Policies \r\n\r\nThe Executive Director of the Africa Centre for Energy Policy (ACEP), Ben Boakye, has urged President John Dramani Mahama to reform the operations of the Mineral Income Investment Fund (MIIF).\r\n\r\nIn a series of tweets, Mr. Boakye outlined critical concerns regarding the fund's creation, operations, and management, emphasizing the need for its resources to directly benefit Ghanaians.\r\n\r\nMr. Boakye explained that MIIF was established to facilitate the controversial Agyapa Royalty Investments, which sought to monetize Ghana\u2019s gold royalties through the London Stock Exchange. The Agyapa transaction, masterminded by then-Finance Minister Ken Ofori-Atta and others, valued royalties from 48 mining concessions at $1 billion, intending to sell 51% of this value for $500 million.\r\n\r\n\u201cParliament was unaware of the true intentions behind the MIIF Act,\u201d Mr Boakye claimed, adding that civil society organizations (CSOs) resisted the transaction due to concerns over transparency and the perpetual loss of revenue to the state. Following public backlash, the Agyapa deal was shelved, allowing Ghana to retain $1.08 billion in royalties over four years.\r\n\r\nHowever, Mr Boakye criticized MIIF\u2019s current operations, alleging that its resources are used for discretionary projects, including school reunions, political events, and other non-priority expenditures.\r\n\r\n\u201cWhile citizens face economic hardships and haircut policies, MIIF remains a wealthy entity with billions of cedis in cash reserves,\u201d he noted.\r\n\r\n\"Civil society organizations (CSOs) that fought against the Agyapa deal expect that the John Dramani Mahama (JDM) government will reverse this unfortunate situation and free up cash for development,\" he added.\r\n\r\nThe Minerals Income Investment Fund (MIIF) is a sovereign minerals fund mandated by the Minerals Income Investment Fund Act, 978 (as amended) to maximize the value of dividend and royalties income accruing to the Republic of Ghana in a beneficial, accountable and sustainable manner and to monetize Ghana\u2019s mineral wealth in a manner which would bring long term value to the country.\r\n\r\n Read Tweets by Mr Boakye Below: \r\n\r\n Why President Mahama Should Not Disappoint on MIIF \r\n\r\n 1. The Mineral Income Investment Fund (MIIF) was created to facilitate the Agyapa Royalty Investments\u2014a concept masterminded by Ken Ofori-Atta and Adu Boahen to sell Ghana\u2019s gold royalties on the London Stock Exchange.\u00a0 \r\n\r\n 2 .At the time the MIIF Act was passed, Parliament was unaware of the true intentions behind it\u2014the Agyapa transaction. However, the sponsors and their numerous allies, including lawyers and financial engineers, knew exactly what they were doing: valuing Ghana\u2019s royalties from the 48 most promising mining concessions at $1 billion and offloading 51% of that value on the stock market for around $500 million. \r\n\r\n 3. We wrote a paper to highlight the distinctiveness of state royalties, arguing that it was unconscionable to treat them like any royalty streaming business. We also pointed out the flaws in assuming definite numbers for mineral deposits, including those still under exploration\u2014the fact that the investor position and the state position are different in natural resource valuation; Investors have time limits to mineral deposits and states maintain perpetual ownership. http:\/\/ \r\n\r\n 4. Mr . Ofori-Atta reduced any disagreement to ideological opposition, showing his determination to push the plan forward regardless of the objections. \r\n\r\n 5 .Thankfully, Ghanaians united to resist the implementation of the Agyapa transaction\u2014 perhaps saved by the election bells in 2020. \r\n\r\n 6. Since the programme was aborted, Ghana has received $1.08 billion in royalties, of which 80% ($865.5 million) would have been tied up in the Agyapa deal in just four years and the rest of Ghana\u2019s gold royalties in perpetuity. This starkly illustrates the poor judgment that went into the decision to sell Ghana\u2019s gold royalties. \r\n\r\n 7. With Agyapa aborted, MIIF, the father of Agyapa, maintained control over the resources for its investment rather than direct development expenditure of that critical share of Ghana\u2019s gold resources. \r\n\r\n 8 .The royalties paid by gold-producing companies are now declared as revenue for MIIF\u2014no effort required. MIIF\u2019s executives are free to hold press conferences to tout their \u201cstellar\u201d performance when the direct efforts of gold producers generate the royalties. \r\n\r\n 9. While the government decimated the investments of citizens and external creditors through haircuts, MIIF remains a wealthy entity with billions of cedis in cash reserves. It funds school reunions, political events, the construction of astroturfs, politically connected small-scale mining operations, and various other investments, besides the huge administrative overheads. \r\n\r\n 10. Civil society organizations (CSOs) that fought against the Agyapa deal expect that the John Dramani Mahama (JDM) government will reverse this unfortunate situation and free up cash for development. \r\n\r\n 11. Prior to recent appointments at MIIF, some compromises were suggested by leading figures in the ruling government: one, a merger of MIIF and the Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund (GIIF) to streamline the funds and create a more purposeful development fund; and two, capping the total allocation to MIIF\/GIIF at a maximum amount (e.g., $5 billion), after which all royalties would revert to the national budget. In essence, to treat allocation to the funds as equity of the state. \r\n\r\n 12. The current situation\u2014where ineffective funds divert resources from the national budget for discretionary abuse by agencies\u2014entrenches inequality and ignores the fundamental challenges facing the country: poor water supply, inadequate schools, a struggling healthcare system, while MIIF remains rich and reckless. \r\n\r\n 13. As we examine the books of MIIF, the nation would be left wondering if this was\/is a sovereign wealth fund or financial banditry with zero risk appetite hitherto possible in sci-fi movies. \r\n\r\n 14. The blessings of natural resources must be spent to improve lives \u2014 love your people. "

"Ben Boakye Urges President Mahama to Review MIIF Structure and Policies"

RMA Demands Public Inquiry into Unibank Collapse, Slams AG’s Decision to Drop ChargesAMP

Revenue Mobilisation Africa Demands Independent Inquiry into Banking Sector Clean-Up, Questions GHS 25bn Public CostAMP

Deloitte Warns of Revenue Risks Despite Upward Revision of 2025 TargetsAMP