"Hershey cocoa spat tests limits of investor ethics"

" \n Ethical investing has become the battlefield in a dispute between Hershey and cocoa-producing countries. Ghana and Ivory Coast have accused the Reese\u2019s maker of dodging payments designed to alleviate farmer poverty and have shut off access to cocoa certified as sustainable from their countries. \n \n\n \n The move may make it harder for the $31 billion group to flaunt its environmental, social and governance credentials. \n \n\n \n Ahead of elections, both countries this year introduced a $400 a tonne premium on cocoa to support local farmers. Yet Accra and Yamoussoukro now say that Hershey tried to avoid paying this by sourcing a large batch of the raw material through futures on the ICE Futures U.S. exchange, which might have been backed by last year\u2019s crop. \n \n\n \n That may have been advantageous given the collapse in cocoa prices after a bumper harvest and a pandemic hit to demand. \n \n\n \n If dodging the surcharge was part of Hershey\u2019s plan, the strategy would have had a short shelf life. In future years, any counterparty sourcing cocoa from the countries would pay the fee, passing on the cost. \n \n\n \n Still, both countries have retaliated by closing down Hershey\u2019s sustainability schemes, which invest in local farms, ensure minimum labour standards and certify its chocolate as sustainable. \n \n\n \n It could be a problem. Hershey boasts that its chocolate is 100% sustainable, verified by independent auditors who follow international labour and environmental standards. \n \n\n \n That puts it ahead of rivals Mondelez and Mars, who have set the same target for 2025. Losing the ethical badge could make it harder to charge premium prices and would spook investors, who claim to value companies\u2019 social credentials. \n \n\n \n To maintain that advantage, Hershey must either patch things up with the two countries in time for next year\u2019s crop \u2013 presumably by paying any missed surcharge \u2013 or find new, sustainable suppliers elsewhere. \n \n\n \n The latter may be hard to do immediately, given that Ghana and Ivory Coast represent around two-thirds of the global market. \n \n\n \n While the two exporters have a strong hand, their attempt to weaponise ethical investing could backfire. \n \n\n \n For one, the real losers are local farmers, who risk missing out on sustainability schemes. And investors, so far, haven\u2019t blinked. Hershey\u2019s shares have actually risen since the news. If investors don\u2019t put a premium on sustainable businesses, companies may lose the incentive to play fair. \n \n\n \n BREAKINGVIEWS \n \n\n \n Reuters Breakingviews is the world's leading source of agenda-setting financial insight. As the Reuters brand for financial commentary, we dissect the big business and economic stories as they break around the world every day. \n \n\n \n A global team of about 30 correspondents in New York, London, Hong Kong and other major cities provides expert analysis in real time. \n "

"Hershey cocoa spat tests limits of investor ethics"

Poor Governance Offsetting Reform Gains in Africa – World BankAMP

Nigeria’s NNPC Considers Refinery Sale Despite Billions Spent on RepairsAMP

Africa’s Largest Diamond Producer to Let Currency Depreciate QuickerAMP