"IMF’s Proposed Carbon Restrictions Could Have Major Economic Repercussions"

" IMF's Proposed Carbon Restrictions Could Have Major Economic Repercussions \r\nAt the height of the covid lockdowns and mandates a massive portion of the global economy was shut down, leading to supply chain instability, huge job losses and a stagflationary crisis.\u00a0 However, climate change propagandists argued that the event was actually a positive for the planet when it was revealed that emissions fell by 5.4%.\u00a0 They asserted that the covid lockdowns were\u00a0 a practice run \u00a0for what they called \"climate lockdowns\" - Presenting a plan for\u00a0 scheduled disruptions \u00a0to global economic activity as a means to slow the effects of climate change.\r\n\r\nGlobalists also presented climate lockdowns as a kind of collective social punishment in the event that populations refused to cut carbon output on their own.\u00a0 As World Economic Forum \"Agenda Contributor\"\u00a0 Mariana Mazzucato argued in 2020: \"Under a \u201cclimate lockdown,\u201d governments would limit private-vehicle use, ban consumption of red meat, and impose extreme energy-saving measures, while fossil-fuel companies would have to stop drilling. To avoid such a scenario, we must overhaul our economic structures and do capitalism differently.\r\n\r\nMany think of the climate crisis as distinct from the health and economic crises caused by the pandemic. But the three crises \u2013 and their solutions \u2013 are interconnected.\r\n\r\nAfter a public uproar over the notion of extending pandemic lockdowns into climate lockdowns, the establishment media would go on to \"Fact Check\" the issue and assert that it was a \"conspiracy theory.\"\u00a0 They lied.\r\n The pandemic lockdowns would eventually be exposed as pointless; a disastrous drain on the global economy that\u00a0 did nothing to prevent the spread \u00a0of the covid virus.\u00a0 But as we witnessed with most of the restrictions instituted during covid, the goal was never to protect the health of the populace.\u00a0 Rather, the goal was to acclimate the populace to an exponentially increasing list of violations of their basic freedoms. \r\nOne organization that has a distinct interest in diminishing economic activity for the sake of preventing global warming is the International Monetary Fund (IMF).\u00a0 In a recent 'call for global climate action' the IMF states that restrictions on economic activity and general emissions activity would have to far surpass those enforced during the pandemic in order to get to their stated temperature target of less than 1.5\u00b0C.\r\n\r\nOpen lockdowns of developed nations might not ultimately be the tool that globalists use to reach net zero, but carbon taxation on an oppressive scale could end up having the same effect.\u00a0 Carbon taxes could act like steep interest rate increases commonly used by central banks to slow economic activity during inflation.\u00a0 An indirect economic shut down of this magnitude would be absolutely devastating for western nations in particular, resulting in crippling energy shortages, food shortages, job losses, and eventually total collapse and a population plunge.\r\n\r\nNet zero is not possible otherwise.\r\n\r\nThe IMF and other globalist organizations suggest that all nations must achieve a net zero carbon goal by 2030 in order to avoid the \"climate cliff\" - The theory that once the Earth hits warming of more than 1.5\u00b0C, there will be a domino effect which will lead to environmental catastrophe and even more carbon emissions and warming.\r\n To be clear, there is no evidence whatsoever to support the idea of the climate cliff, primarily because there is no evidence of a causation relationship between carbon emissions and global warming.\u00a0 In fact, there is no evidence that that human industry has a warming effect on the climate whatsoever. \r\nTemperature records for hundreds of millions of years prove that warming periods are a mainstay of the Earth's climate history.\u00a0 In comparison, our current era is one of the coldest, not the warmest.\u00a0 Climate scientists ignore this data and use temperature records going back to the 1880s.\u00a0 Meaning, their data is based on a mere 140 years of the Earth's history.\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\nThe current warming rate is not significant to other periods, nor is there any evidence that human activity is causing it.\u00a0 Data on carbon levels of the past show that temperatures do not necessarily rise in tandem with carbon activity.\u00a0 Carbon emissions are also far lower today than they have been in the past. The claim that carbon concentration due to human activity has a drastic influence on global temperatures (or weather) is absolutely unfounded.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n The real reason for climate controls and carbon taxes seems to have far more to do with wealth redistribution from developed nations over to developing nations.\u00a0 The agenda is about centralizing the control of national wealth as well as individual liberties and private property.\u00a0 And the IMF, of course, would like to be one of the institutions at the helm of that wealth management empire. "

"IMF’s Proposed Carbon Restrictions Could Have Major Economic Repercussions"

Africa’s Smallholder Farmers are Using Bright Ideas to Adapt to Climate Change: G20 Countries Should Fund Their EffortsAMP

World Bank Urges Zimbabwe to Seek G-20 Support in Ending 25-Year Debt DefaultAMP

BoG Sells GHS 10.37 Billion in 56-Day BillAMP