"New mining law imperils Ghana\u2019s environmental legacy"

" New mining law imperils Ghana\u2019s environmental legacy \r\n\r\nOn May 17, 2017, I co-convened a national stakeholder forum and campaign against\u00a0irresponsible mining\u00a0in Ghana at the La Palm Royal Beach.\r\n \r\n \r\n Several representatives across government, traditional rulers, cognoscenti, civil society and local communities spoke at the occasion. \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\nHowever,\u00a0Nana Kobina Nketsia V,\u00a0the Omanhene of the\u00a0Essikado Traditional Area\u2019s\u00a0voice still echoes in my head. Speaking to the theme, \u2018Mobilising national efforts for responsible mining\u2019, he began by asking: \u2018What legacy are we leaving behind for the next generation of Ghanaians yet unborn?\u2019\r\n\r\nThe government\u2019s controversial promulgation and continued gung-ho application of the Environmental Protection (Mining in Forest Reserves) Regulations, 2022 (L.I. 2462) leads me to believe \u2013 unless it changes course incontrovertibly and with unerring alacrity \u2013 its legacy is a gangrenous chalice.\r\n\r\nIts legacy is a looming environmental catastrophe, a stark betrayal of public trust and an indelible stain on our nation\u2019s history. The Akufo-Addo-Bawumia government risks being remembered not for Free SHS or prosperity but for ecological devastation and the irreversible harm inflicted on future generations.\r\n\r\nA landmark report that led to the emergence of forest reserves in our country was the Thompson Report of 1911. The author held that forest reserves were essential to stall the advancement of the Sahara Desert, create a good microclimate for cocoa production and safeguard our headwaters.\r\n\r\nAdditionally, we need forest reserves to: protect our endemic biodiversity, reduce the risks of epidemics and pandemics and mitigate climate change.\u00a0Before L.I. 2462, we had incoherent policies on mining in forest reserves.\r\n\r\nWhereas our National Land Policy proscribes mining in reserves, our Forest and Wildlife Policy and other administrative guidelines were lax. Unfortunately, the promulgation of L.I. 2462 has opened the floodgates for mining in forest reserves.\r\n\r\nConsider this: before L.I. 2462, mining in forest reserves was estimated at 4,700 ha. Barely 18 months after the law passed, the government is reported to have granted mining rights on about 390,000 ha, i.e., 22 per cent of our forest reserves \u2013 14 more applicants are awaiting decisions from the Minerals Commission. At this rate, we\u2019ll have no forest reserves by 2035.\r\n\r\n Breaches \r\n\r\nCritics, including environmental law experts, have scrutinised L.I. 2462, highlighting constitutional breaches and legal inconsistencies. First, the legislation empowers and relies on the Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) \u00a0for implementation despite the Agency lacking \u2018constitutional authority and mandate to manage natural resources.\u2019\r\n\r\nSecond, L.I. 2462 over-extends the authority of the minister in charge of Lands and Natural Resources, while lacking a proper legal foundation under the Environmental Protection Act of 1994 (Act 490). Its scope is misaligned with permitted activities within Act 490, making it constitutionally questionable.\r\n\r\nThird, in Ghana, forest reserves are established by the President via Executive Instruments (E.I.), managed by the Forestry Commission and can only be altered by an E.I. or an Act of Parliament. L.I. 2462, created by the EPA, lacks the legislative authority to override these protections, as an L.I. cannot implicitly repeal an E.I. Thus, without explicit constitutional allowance, L.I. 2462 cannot authorise mining in forest reserves or diminish their protections, which are firmly rooted in higher parliamentary acts.\r\n\r\nFurthermore, the legislation\u2019s lenient sanctions orientation, one-year imprisonment (maximum), and 250 penalty units (GHS 3000) \u2013raise concerns about its adequacy in deterring environmental degradation.\r\n\r\n Dangerous \r\n\r\nA more dangerous and yet insidious effect of L.I. 2462 concerns how profits from mining in forest reserves find their way into our national politics, including reinforcing vote-buying, political patronage and clientelism.\r\n\r\nThese are all serious threats to our democracy and social well-being.\u00a0Unless we act swiftly to repeal L.I. 2462 and protect the government from itself, the Akufo-Addo-Bawumia administration\u2019s legacy may not only be a damaged environment and polluted water bodies but also a deeply wounded democracy.\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n We must prioritise the preservation of our natural heritage and the integrity of our political system for the sake of future generations. \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\nThe writer is a Researcher, Land, Society, and Governance Group, Leverhulme Centre for Nature Recovery, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, UK; Partnership for Agriculture, Conservation and Transformation (PACT), Ghana."

"New mining law imperils Ghana\u2019s environmental legacy"

Sinner Dominates Tien to Secure China Open TitleAMP

President Mahama Vows Tougher Action on Cybercrime, Promises Collaboration with Global PartnersAMP

Government to Establish Cyber Security Fund to Bolster Digital DefencesAMP

Headline Inflation Hits Single-Digit With 9.4% Rate in September 2025AMP

Bank of Ghana Prices 1oz Gold Coin at GHS 49,131.99AMP

Ghana Hosts IGAD Delegation on Land Governance ExchangeAMP

First National Bank Champions Health, Unity, and National Pride With the 2025 Accra MarathonAMP

U.S. Government Shutdown Leaves Energy Markets on EdgeAMP

Gold Miners Stage Comeback as Share Sales Surge to Record HighAMP

Sinner Dominates Tien to Secure China Open TitleAMP

President Mahama Vows Tougher Action on Cybercrime, Promises Collaboration with Global PartnersAMP

Government to Establish Cyber Security Fund to Bolster Digital DefencesAMP

Headline Inflation Hits Single-Digit With 9.4% Rate in September 2025AMP

Bank of Ghana Prices 1oz Gold Coin at GHS 49,131.99AMP