"Ongoing criminal case following revocation of licenses of some banks in the country\u00a0"

" Ongoing criminal case following revocation of licenses of some banks in the country\u00a0 \r\n\r\nFollowing the revocation of the licence of UT Bank Ghana Ltd (UT Bank), the Attorney-General initiated criminal proceedings against certain shareholders, directors and employees of UT Bank as well as former officials of the Bank of Ghana (BoG).\r\n\r\nThe charge sheet filed at the Accra High Court on 5 th February 2020 named as accused persons Dr. Johnson Asiama; a former 2nd Deputy Governor of BoG, Raymond Amanfu; a former Head of the Banking Supervision Division (BSD) of BoG, Catherine Johnson; Head of Treasury of the UT Bank, Mr. Prince Kofi Amoabeng, a former Chief Executive Officer of UT Bank, Robert Kwesi Armah; General Manager of Corporate Banking of UT Bank and UT Holdings; the parent company of UT Bank.\r\n\r\nThe trial judge is His Lordship Justice Bright Mensah, a Justice of the Court of Appeal sitting as an additional High Court judge.\r\n\r\nDr. Asiama and Mr. Amanfu have been charged with willfully causing financial loss to the state, while Mr. Amoabeng and the other accused persons have been charged with various offenses such as dishonest appropriation of USD 7 million and other deposits of customers and fraudulent breach of trust among other charges.\r\n\r\nSo far, the prosecution has called Eric Nana Nipah, the Receiver of UT Bank (in Receivership), Mr. Stephen Afotey, Registrar of the High Court (Commercial Division) and Mr.\u00a0 Stephen Antwi-Assimeng, a former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the defunct UT Bank to testify on its behalf.\r\n\r\nIn his testimony, the first Prosecution Witness, Eric Nana Nipah informed the Court that various investments placed by various companies such as, SSNIT SOS Fund, Forestry Commission, ECG Staff Fund, WAICA-Re and the National Communications Authority with UT Bank were moved out to UT Holdings without proper authorization.\r\n\r\nHe testified that UT Holdings is not licensed to engage in such investment activities.\r\n\r\nThe total amounts invested with UT Bank but transferred to UT Holdings without proper authorization is GHS 51,334,387.08 and USD$8,799,917.\r\n\r\nThe second Prosecution Witness, Mr. Stephen Afotey, testified that an amount of US$ 7 million was deposited with UT Bank on the instructions of the Court.\r\n\r\nThis amount could not be traced when UT Bank was taken over by GCB Bank.\r\n\r\nIn November, the Court heard the testimony of the third Prosecution Witness, Mr. Stephen Antwi-Assimeng, the Chief Executive Officer of UT Bank at the time of the revocation of its license.\r\n\r\nHe testified that UT Bank was already on liquidity support from BoG at the time he joined the bank.\r\n\r\nMr. Antwi-Assimeng intimated that UT Bank relied heavily on borrowing from BoG to deal with its liquidity challenges.\r\n\r\nIn his testimony, Mr. Antwi-Assimeng indicated that UT Bank established letters of credit in the total sum of GHS 141 million, for some customers of the bank and these letters of credit were maturing in May and July of 2016.\r\n\r\nHe further informed the Court that the customers did not provide funds for the Letters of Credit and neither did UT Bank have liquidity on maturity.\r\n\r\nTestifying further, Mr. Antwi-Assimeng stated that they had situations where a number of international lenders were calling in their loans because UT Bank had defaulted and some of the loans had reached maturity.\r\n\r\nHe testified further that UT Bank was experiencing an average of 40 million cedis loss of customer deposits, one of the bank\u2019s key sources of liquidity.\r\n\r\nThis, according to him, resulted in acute liquidity shortage with UT Bank forced to pay higher interest rates to attract new depositors.\r\n\r\nProceeding further, Mr. Antwi-Assimeng informed the Court that UT Bank, on application to BoG, received liquidity support of 460 Million Ghana Cedis with the instruction not to use any part of the additional liquidity support for unapproved purposes.\r\n\r\nHe also informed the Court that UT bank also applied to BOG for an unsecured liquidity support of GHS 30 Million. He explained that UT Bank\r\n\r\napplied for the unsecured liquidity support because it did not have adequate securities to provide collateral for this facility.\r\n\r\nThe matter has been adjourned for further hearing in mid-December.\r\n\r\n "

"Ongoing criminal case following revocation of licenses of some banks in the country\u00a0"

Chamber of Bulk Oil Distributors criticises Government’s proposal to make BEST sole off-taker for Sentuo Oil RefineryAMP

SML counters The Fourth Estate’s allegations of 10-year contract and $100 million annual payments with KPMG reportAMP

SML challenges KPMG’s GHS 1bn compensation payment in GRA contract auditAMP