"Seth Terkper reacts to Dr Touna-Mama\u2019s ‘Ghana not classified as Low-Income Country’ comment"

" \n Former Minister for Finance, Seth Terkper, has reacted to statements made by Dr Albert Touna-Mama, the IMF Representative to Ghana, over the country\u2019s classification as a Low-Income Country (LIC) from a Middle-Income Country (MIC) status. \n \n\n \n As reported by norvanreports on Monday, April 12, 2021, Ghana according to the IMF\u2019s 2021 April Fiscal Monitor Report, was classified as a Low-Income Country (LIC). \n \n\n \n The downgrade of the country\u2019s income status, is due to the poor state of the nation\u2019s fiscal economy given the fact that budget deficit end-2020 was 11.7 percent with debt to GDP reaching 76.1 percent, using more than 110 percent of tax revenues to pay for wages, compensations and interest payments among others. \n \n\n \n But reacting to the report, Dr. Albert Touna-Mama, described as \u2018fake news\u2019, the media reportage that Ghana had been classified a Low-Income Country (LIC). \n \n\n \n According to Dr Albert Touna-Mama, the generally accepted classification of countries by income level - low, lower-middle, upper-middle, and high-income - is done by the World Bank. \n \n\n \n Adding the classifications are updated each year on July 1 and are based on the Gross National Income (GNI) per capita in current USD (using the Atlas method exchange rates) of the previous year (2019 in this case). \n \n\n \n He further stated that the latest updated classification was completed on July 1, 2020 with Ghana still classified as a Lower Middle-Income Country by the World Bank. \n \n\n \n It later turned out the IMF had been also engaged in classification over the last number of years and indeed had since inception classified Ghana as a Low-Income Country (LIC) usinf their own parameters which was different from that of the World Bank. \n \n\n \n Reacting to Dr Touna-Mama\u2019s assertion, Mr Terkper, despite admitting to the fact that Ghana, per the World Bank\u2019s classification criteria, is still a Middle-Income Country (MIC), the country\u2019s indices are that of a Low-Income Country. \n \n\n \n \u201cThe institution responsible for categorizing the income-level of countries is the World Bank and it uses the country\u2019s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in doing that.\u201d \n \n\n \n \u201cThe World Bank takes the total income of the country which is the GDP and divides it by the total population to arrive at an amount which each individual in the country is supposed to get known as the per capita income. When that amount falls below $1,100, the country is classified as a LIC, if the amount falls between $1,100 and $12,000 the country is classified as a MIC, above that the country is classified as an advanced economy or high-income country.\u201d \n \n\n \n \u201cSo when you use the World Bank\u2019s primary criteria, which is the per capita income, Ghana is still a middle income country, because the country\u2019s per capita income is at the moment above $2,000 because of the rebasing, and the growth in the services and construction sectors and the oil,\u201d he stated. \n \n\n \n He continued saying, \u201cNow the report is a fiscal report, and just like how institutions like Moody\u2019s and Fitch Ratings can take a look at the country\u2019s fiscals and downgrade a country, the IMF looks at your status as a MIC and asks, how should or how are MICs behaving. Now the consequences of becoming a middle-income country is losing grants and concessional financing.\u201d \n \n\n \n \u201cAnd this is because your income has gone up and you are expected to take care of yourself better so the world can take care of the fragile countries. And as a middle-income country in the Sub Saharan region we are to generate between 18 and 20 percent tax revenues to GDP but as a country we are doing around 12 to 13 percent.\u201d \n \n\n \n \u201cGhana\u2019s indices as compared to that of other middle-income countries as captured in the report are bad. Even the indices of some of the low-middle income countries in the report are better than ours. Their average deficits is around 5 to 6 percent, but ours is around 13 percent and we are not generating enough revenue too.\u201d \n \n\n \n \u201cWe are heading towards 80 percent debt to GDP, we use between 110 and 150 percent of tax revenues to service compensations and interest payments and not to talk about the principal.\u201d \n \n\n \n Quizzed if Ghana could potentially be classified as a LIC in the World Bank\u2019s next income classification update on July 1 this year, the former Finance Minister answered in the affirmative saying it is likely Ghana can be classified as an LIC. \n \n\n \n \u201cIf we put all of our indices together, then we could be classified as a low-income country this July when the world bank does it\u2019s classification,\u201d he averred. \n "

"Seth Terkper reacts to Dr Touna-Mama\u2019s ‘Ghana not classified as Low-Income Country’ comment"

Ghana’s GDP Growth Forecast Raised to 6.2% for 2025 on Strong Mining OutlookAMP

Sustainable Banking Principles to Guide ESG Integration and Risk Assessment in Construction Sector Financing – BoGAMP

Asian Teams Gear Up for FIFA Women’s World Cup Qualification in Tough DrawAMP