"UEFA introduces 70% squad cost rule as part of new financial regulations"

" \n UEFA introduces 70% squad cost rule as part of new financial regulations \n \n\n \n UEFA has brought in new financial regulations which will limit clubs\u2019 spending on wages, transfers and agents\u2019 fees to 70% of their revenue. \n \n\n \n Permitted losses over a three-year period have also risen from 30m euros (\u00a324.98m) to 60m euros (\u00a349.96m). \n \n\n \n The new rules will come into force in June and clubs will have three years to implement them. \n \n\n \n Uefa said \u201cbreaches will result in pre-defined financial penalties and sporting measures\u201d. \n \n\n \n It is thought new reinforced punishments, including points deductions, demotion to lower-ranking competitions and potential exclusion from European football completely, will be introduced as part of the new regulations. \n \n\n \n Clubs are expected to be allowed to spend 90% of their income in 2023-24, reducing to 80% in 2024-25 and 70% a year later. \n \n\n \n The new \u201cfinancial sustainability regulations\u201d have been put together by Uefa and the influential European Clubs Association (ECA) and \u201care the first major reform\u201d of the financial fair play (FFP) rules introduced in 2010. \n \n\n \n \u201cUefa\u2019s first financial regulations, introduced in 2010, served its primary purpose,\u201d said Aleksander Ceferin, president of European football\u2019s governing body. \n \n\n \n \u201cThey helped pull European football finances back from the brink and revolutionised how European football clubs are run. \n \n\n \n Read: UEL: Frankfurt hold Barcelona to a 1-1 draw\u00a0 \n \n\n \n \u201cHowever, the evolution of the football industry, alongside the inevitable financial effects of the pandemic, has shown the need for wholesale reform and new financial sustainability regulations. \n \n\n \n \u201cThese [new] regulations will help us protect the game and prepare it for any potential future shock, while encouraging rational investments and building a more sustainable future for the game.\u201d \n \n\n \n In a statement, Uefa added : \u201cWhile the acceptable deviation has increased from 30m euros over three years to 60m over three years, requirements to ensure the fair value of transactions, to improve the clubs\u2019 balance sheet, and to reduce debts have been significantly strengthened. \n \n\n \n \u201cThe biggest innovation in the new regulations will be the introduction of a squad cost rule to bring better cost control in relation to player wages and transfer costs. \n \n\n \n \u201cThe regulation limits spending on wages, transfers, and agent fees to 70% of club revenue.\u201d \n \n\n \n What are the current FFP rules? \n \n\n \n Currently, clubs can spend up to 5m euros more than they earn per three-year assessment period. However, they can exceed this level to a limit of 30m euros, if it is entirely covered by a direct contribution\/payment from the club owner(s) or a related party. According to Uefa, the idea of this was to \u201cprevent the build-up of unsustainable debt\u201d. \n \n\n \n Uefa has a wide-ranging list of potential punishments for clubs which break these rules, from a warning to loss of European titles. In 2020, Wolves were fined 200k euros and given a 23-man squad limit instead of the usual 25 after breaching Uefa\u2019s FFP rules. \n \n\n \n However, given the financial impact of Covd-19, which has seen European top-flight clubs lose \u00a37bn, Uefa felt the rules needed to be changed. \n \n\n \n There had been speculation around the implementation of an actual salary cap, but this idea has now been abandoned. \n "

"UEFA introduces 70% squad cost rule as part of new financial regulations"

Top 10 African Countries With the Weakest Currencies in July 2025AMP

U.S. Demands $15,000 Deposit for Visa Applicants From Zambia and MalawiAMP

BoG Governor Urges Banks to Rethink Business Models as Interest Rates DeclineAMP