"We need global coordination on data, not just AI; here’s why"

" We need global coordination on data, not just AI; here's why \r\n \r\n\r\nData is foundational to a digital world. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) over the past year have highlighted its value by enabling more human-like interaction through vast data processing.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nData is one of the\u00a0 three pillars of generative AI , along with computational power and access to talent. It is increasingly the lifeblood of participation in public and private life. More complex and integrated technologies mean data will continue to be more important. A business\u2019s\u00a0 economic advantage is now linked to intensive data \u00a0use. And as governments undergo digital transformations, data mediates citizen inclusion and participation, from access to public services to identification at borders.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nDespite the transforming potential of data, there remains a huge inequity regarding who benefits from its expanding uses, particularly between the majority and minority worlds. While the former has significant data on health, education, economics and social media, they can not draw value from it.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nWhile\u00a0 data equity \u00a0is being considered globally \u2013 such as via\u00a0 the International Monetary Fund\u2019s initiative to address policy-level data gaps \u00a0in Group of 20 (G20) nations \u2013 these efforts do not address fundamental power inequalities to accessing data at the country and firm level or the resources required to derive value from it.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nDespite the foundational nature of data and such evident inequalities, the focus of current discourses on digital questions is scattered.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n Digital infrastructure focus \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nFirst, there is a global conversation on the\u00a0 digital divide , within which is a sub-discussion on digital public infrastructure (DPI) and access to technology. There is a focus on responsible, accessible DPI that enables people to transact more meaningfully online, as pushed by\u00a0 ID for Africa \u00a0or another pan-African movement\u00a0 50in5 . The Indian and Brazilian G20 presidencies have promoted DPI as well. However, the DPI focus has not adequately acknowledged the vast data generated through identity, payments or data exchanges.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n \u201cAs a core input and product of changing digital systems and infrastructures, data isn\u2019t being considered in its own right.\r\n \u201d G20 discussions about data have been fragmented, with the Digital Economy Working Group exploring DPI, the Women 20 subset discussing the digital gender divide and the T20 \u2013 the segment that brings together think tanks and research institutes \u2013 looking at knowledge production between data justice and inclusive digital transformations. \r\n \r\n \r\n Ubiquitous AI \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nThe second core area of global attention is AI, promoted through now ubiquitous AI summits e.g. recent events include the\u00a0 AI Safety Summit \u00a0in the United Kingdom on risks of AI development and in\u00a0 Seoul , South Korea, on AI Safety, Security and Innovation. There have also been multilateral forums such as that organized on the sidelines of the World Summit of the Information Society +20 \u2013 the\u00a0 AI for Good Summit . The World Economic Forum had its own AI summit too, alongside several smaller ones.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nFrom one view, inequalities in the benefits from data are captured within both areas of global concern. With DPI, for example, global entities such as\u00a0 Co-Develop \u00a0seek to address global inequalities, in this instance, with a mandate to fund the creation of digital infrastructure in countries. Around AI, the\u00a0 Group of Seven\u2019s AI Hub\u00a0 aims to support the developing world. The process of developing the Global Digital Compact has also given rise to debates over equitable and accessible data and data governance.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nSo why is data still not part of the discourse on the digital divide, digital public infrastructure, or AI and innovation?\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n Redirecting discourse \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nThe issue lies in \u201chow\u201d\u00a0data is considered and to what extent references to data allow policy actors to understand and make decisions about it, given its fundamental and evolving role in all areas of life.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nExisting global conversations focus on either (i) the creation of infrastructures that produce data, so do not adequately study the governance of data, or (ii) are concerned with the consequences of the use of data through AI models, so do not meaningfully consider data itself as the input to these applications. As a core input and product of changing digital systems and infrastructures, data isn\u2019t being considered in its own right.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nThere could be practical reasons for this gap. It can be simply easier to conceptualize and govern instants of data use. AI models and outputs can be easier to view, while \u201cdata\u201d in and of itself is tricky to grapple with \u2013 is it an economic good or individual asset, or is it relational and collective?\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nThe language used to talk about data and data governance has also struggled to capture the realities of data. The idea of data ownership can fail to capture how data is replicable, produced through multiple actors, and becomes valuable in the aggregate or combination. Efforts that help people have agency over data, such as rights of portability, take place at an individual level, rendering them meaningless beyond specific uses.\r\n \r\n Data on the agenda \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nWe believe data needs its own place in the multilateral agenda so that the different facets of data can be addressed holistically across the majority and minority worlds.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nAs a core input and output of digital systems and infrastructures, countries must be able to make informed decisions about the governance of data, as well as its risks and opportunities. That requires multilateral and multi-stakeholder processes, including diverse stakeholders who are part of the data economy \u2013 civil society organizations, labour unions, private sector organizations and regional and national governments. Different stakeholders can help shed light on the risks and values of forms of data across various contexts and perspectives.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nThrough such comprehensive engagements, forums can build a fuller understanding of data-in-context and data-in-use and approach data governance from an informed position cognizant of evolving global realities.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nSecond, tying the complexities of the data agenda more concretely with multilateral discussions will help build solidarities and collaborative action and exchange knowledge. Despite persistent claims that data is the new oil, it is not - \u00a0it is produced, reproduced and becomes valuable in distinct ways , which can be challenging to grasp. A multilateral and multi-stakeholder forum that promotes open access to information and knowledge sharing about data-in-context can help ground data in lived realities, giving policy actors a robust understanding of considerations around data.\r\n \r\n Data in focus \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nWhile multilateral effort is key, an immediate starting point can be the establishment of a Data20 (D20) within the G20 as a high visibility, multi-stakeholder space, which encourages open discussions through non-binding forums.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nA D20 could bridge different stakeholder groups and countries that engage across the G20 around their common concern for data. The space could collate, quality-assure and share insights from complementary processes and anchor collaborative action from different stakeholders. It could also serve the G20 as a space to help encourage and feed into a more globally inclusive and multi-stakeholder knowledge base about data use, challenges and policy approaches.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\nThe focus on DPI and AI while ignoring concerns around data means the global community is not addressing data's foundational role in informing global digital inequalities. Multilateral and multi-stakeholder action is needed now as a first step to help bridge the gap.\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n "

"We need global coordination on data, not just AI; here’s why"

Tullow’s $307m Big Move: Gabon Exit Sets Stage for Ghana and Kenya PushAMP

Ghana’s GDP Growth Forecast Raised to 6.2% for 2025 on Strong Mining OutlookAMP

Sustainable Banking Principles to Guide ESG Integration and Risk Assessment in Construction Sector Financing – BoGAMP