"Why African judges still wearing wigs is a glaring symbol of British colonialism"

" \n The British gave up their last colonies in Africa half a century ago. But they left their wigs behind. \n \n\n \n Not just any wigs. They are the long, white horsehair locks worn by high court judges (and King George III). They are so old-fashioned, and so uncomfortable, that even British barristers have stopped wearing them. \n \n\n \n But in former British colonies \u2013 Kenya, Zimbabwe, Ghana, Malawi and others \u2013 they live on, worn by judges and lawyers. Now, a new generation of African jurists is asking: Why are the continent\u2019s most prominent legal minds still wearing the trappings of the colonisers? \n \n\n \n It\u2019s not just a question of aesthetics. The wigs and robes are perhaps the most glaring symbol of colonial inheritance at a time when that history is being dredged up in all sorts of ways. This year, Tanzanian President John Magufuli described a proposed free trade agreement with Europe as a \u201cform of colonialism\u201d. In Zimbabwe, President Robert Mugabe still refers to the British as \u201cthieving colonialists\u201d. \n \n\n \n In June, the premier of Cape Town was suspended from her party after writing on Twitter that modern healthcare was a colonial contribution. \n \n\n \n The relics of colonialism are scattered across the continent. There are the queen\u2019s namesakes: Victoria Falls north of Zimbabwe, Lake Victoria east of Uganda, Victoria Island in Nigeria. There is the left-lane driving, the cricket, the way public education is organised (not organised). \n \n\n \n Most cities and streets have received new names since the Europeans left. In 2013, Mugabe officially rebaptised Victoria Falls \u201cMosi Oa Tunya\u201d, or \u201cthe smoke that thunders\u201d in the Kololo language. \n \n\n \n Yet the wig survives, along with other relics of the colonial courtroom: red robes, white bows, references to judges as \u201cmy lord\u201d and \u201cmy lady\u201d. \n \n\n \n In nearly every former British colony, op-eds have been written and speeches made about why the wig ought to be removed. In Uganda, the\u00a0 New Vision \u00a0newspaper conducted an investigation into the cost of the wigs, reporting that each one cost $6,500. \n \n\n \n In Ghana, a prominent lawyer, Augustine Niber, argued that removing wigs would reduce the \u201cintimidation and fear that often characterise our courtrooms\u201d. \n \n\n \n One of the editors of the Nigerian Lawyer blog wrote that wigs weren\u2019t made for the sweltering Lagos heat, where lawyers melted under their garb. \u201cThe culture that invented the wig and gown is different from our own and the weather is different,\u201d Unini Chioma wrote. \n \n\n \n Increasingly, though, opponents of the colonial outfit aren\u2019t just arguing against inconvenience but against a tradition that African judiciaries appear to be embracing. Britain\u2019s \u201ccolonial courts\u201d, which preceded independence, were sometimes brutal. \n \n\n \n In response to Kenya\u2019s Mau Mau rebellion in the 1950s, for example, the wigged, white judges sentenced more than 1,000 people to death for conspiring against colonial rule. \n \n\n \n \u201cThe colonial system used law as an instrument of repression, and we\u2019re still maintaining this tradition without questioning it,\u201d said Arnold Tsunga, director of the Africa program at the International Commission of Jurists. \u201cIt\u2019s a disgrace to the modern courts of Africa.\u201d \n \n\n \n In Kenya, former chief justice Willy Mutunga appealed to remove the wigs from the courtroom, arguing that they were a foreign imposition, not a Kenyan tradition. He swapped the traditional British red robes for \u201cKenyanised\u201d green and yellow ones. He called the wigs \u201cdreadful\u201d. \n \n\n \n But that outlook wasn\u2019t shared by many Kenyan judges and lawyers, who saw the wigs and robes as their own uniforms, items that elevate a courtroom, despite \u2013 or because of \u2013 their colonial links. \n \n\n \n \u201cIt was met with consternation from within the bench and the bar,\u201d said Isaac Okero, president of the Law Society of Kenya. \n \n\n \n Okero is a defender of the wig and the robe, and argues that they represent more than a British tradition, but something that distinguishes the country\u2019s judges. \n \n\n \n \u201cI don\u2019t feel at all that it has any negative connotation of colonialism. It has risen beyond that. It is a tradition of the Kenyan bar,\u201d he said. \n \n\n \n This year, Kenya\u2019s new chief justice, David Maraga, has indicated that he wants to revert to the colonial traditions. During his swearing-in ceremony, he wore a long white wig and the British-style red robe. Many Kenyans were perplexed. \n \n\n \n \u201cIt was his rather peculiar outfit that would send a resounding message to Kenyans,\u201d said a broadcaster on KTN, one of the country\u2019s most popular news channels. \u201cIt\u2019s back to the old days.\u201d \n \n\n \n In Zimbabwe, still ruled by vehement anti-colonialist Robert Mugabe, the wigs are perhaps most mystifying. Why would a man who stripped white farmers of their land, who railed against the name of Victoria Falls, allow an archaic judicial tradition to remain in place? \n \n\n \n Some analysts say that the policy reveals something about Mugabe the closet Anglophile, a fan of Dickens who once said cricket \u201ccivilises people and creates good gentlemen\u201d. \n \n\n \n But Tsunga argues that the rationale is more insidious. \n \n\n \n \u201cWe are seeing post-independence African states trying to maintain these symbols of power and authority in the belief that it will help entrench themselves,\u201d he said. \n \n\n \n The curly horsehair wigs have been used in court since the 1600s, during the reign of Charles II, when they became a symbol of the British judicial system. Some historians say they were initially popularised by France\u2019s King Louis XIV, who was trying to conceal his balding head. \n \n\n \n By the 18th century, they were meant to distinguish judges and lawyers \u2013 and other members of the upper crust. Enter the word \u201cbigwig\u201d into the lexicon. \n \n\n \n Other countries in the British Commonwealth, such as Australia and Canada, also inherited the wigs and robes but have moved toward removing them from courtrooms. An Australian chief justice last year demanded that barristers remove their wigs before addressing her. \n \n\n \n \u201cThe abolition of wigs is all part of the progression towards a modern way,\u201d said the chief justice, Marilyn Warren. \n \n\n \n This year in Britain, the House of Commons lifted the requirement that clerks, who are experts in parliamentary law, wear wigs. John Bercow, the speaker, said the change would promote a \u201cmarginally less stuffy and forbidding image of this chamber\u201d. \n \n\n \n But aside from the wigs, African courts have adapted to a post-colonial context. New constitutions have been written. A new generation of judges has emerged. Even though some judiciaries have bent to political pressure, new legal systems are rooted in British common law but shaped by the traditions and cultures of their own countries. \n \n\n \n In Kenya this month, the Supreme Court annulled the recent presidential election, a bold display of judicial independence that infuriated the sitting president. \n \n\n \n In the Nairobi courtroom where the ruling was delivered, several lawyers wore their powdered wigs. Behind the bench, a row of men and women in red robes presided. \n \n\n \n Maraga sat down before speaking, the sleeves of his black robe hanging over the bench. \n \n\n \n \u201cThe greatness of a nation lies in its fidelity to its constitution,\u201d he said, \u201cand a strict adherence to the rule of law.\u201d \n "

"Why African judges still wearing wigs is a glaring symbol of British colonialism"

Tribute to a World Champion as Samuel Umtiti Ends Stellar Career AMP

UEFA Champions League: Five Dark Horses Ready to Keep an eye on AMP

GSE Indices Extend Gains as MTN Dominates TradingAMP