• Login
NORVANREPORTS.COM |  Business News, Insurance, Taxation, Oil & Gas, Maritime News, Ghana, Africa, World
  • Home
  • News
    • General
    • Political
  • Economy
  • Business
    • Agribusiness
    • Aviation
    • Banking & Finance
    • Energy
    • Insurance
    • Manufacturing
    • Markets
    • Maritime
    • Real Estate
    • Tourism
    • Transport
  • Technology
    • Telecom
    • Cyber-security
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Tech-guide
    • Social Media
  • Features
    • Interviews
    • Opinions
  • Reports
    • Banking/Finance
    • Insurance
    • Budgets
    • GDP
    • Inflation
    • Central Bank
    • Sec/Gse
  • Lifestyle
    • Sports
    • Entertainment
    • Travel
    • Environment
    • Weather
  • NRTV
    • Audio
    • Video
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
NORVANREPORTS.COM |  Business News, Insurance, Taxation, Oil & Gas, Maritime News, Ghana, Africa, World
No Result
View All Result
Home Features

In Re Ato Forson & 2 Others; A critical examination of the application by Counsel for the third accused to quash criminal charges –  M. B. Yeboah 

1 year ago
in Features, highlights, Home, home-news, latest News
4 min read
0 0
0
43
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin

In Re Ato Forson & 2 Others; A critical examination of the application by Counsel for the third accused to quash criminal charges –  M. B. Yeboah 

A person charged with an offence may bring an application that the charge be quashed  on the ground that it is defective for one reason or the other, or that the proof of evidence  does not disclose a prima facie case against him sufficient to warrant calling upon him to  provide some explanation or even undergo the rigour of a full trial. See Chief Lere Adebayo  v. The State (2012) LPELR-9494(CA) per Kekere-Ekun, JCA (as he then was). 

On the 30th day of May 2024, counsel for the 3rd accused person in the person of the highly  revered Thaddeus Sory applied to have “the charges against his client terminated or in the  alternative stayed”. 

In arguing his grounds, the highly esteemed counsel based his arguments on three  grounds namely;  

  1. That the learned Attorney-General has abused his constitutional power to  prosecute the accused person,  
  2. The trial is tantamount to an abuse of process and  

III. That the trial stifles the right of the accused person to have a fair trial   

I proceed to examine the strength or otherwise of each of the three grounds stated supra;   

THAT THE LEARNED ATTORNEY-GENERAL HAS ABUSED HIS CONSTITUTIONAL POWER TO  PROSECUTE THE ACCUSED PERSON  

RelatedPosts

Parliament Adjourns Sine Die After Intense Legislative Session Marked by Reform Calls and Tributes

GACL Terminates Evatex Revenue Assurance Contract Amid OSP Probe

Cyber Security Authority Flags Rising Mobile Data Scam, Cautions Public

Jurisdiction is always a fundamental issue in every matter that comes before any court  and, even if it is not questioned by any of the parties, a court must advert its mind to it to  assure a valid outcome.  

The 1992 Constitution provides in article 21 as follows; 

The functions of the Commission shall be defined and prescribed by Act of Parliament and  shall include the duty.  

(a) to investigate complaints of violations of fundamental rights and freedoms, injustice,  corruption, abuse of power and unfair treatment of any person by a public officer in the  exercise of his official duties;  

From the above provision of the 1992 Constitution, it is trite learning that the Constitution  has clearly established a forum and has gone further to lay down the procedure for an individual who alleges an abuse of office by a public servant to vent his spleen and that  no other procedure or tribunal to challenge an abuse of office by the Attorney-General who  is a public servant will suffice.  

This position of the law as captured in WILKINSON v BARKING CORPORATION [1948] 1  KB 721 @ 724 per Asquith, L.J. and in PASMORE v OSWALD TWISTLE UDC [1898] AC 387  at page 394, per Lord Halsbury that; “where a statute creates a right and in plain language  gives a specific remedy or appoints a specific tribunal for its enforcement, a party seeking  to enforce the right must resort to that specific remedy or tribunal and not others.” 

This position of the law has had the blessing of the Supreme Court speaking through  Hayfron-Benjamin, JSC in Yeboah v. J. H. Mensah [1998-99] SCGLR 492: where he states  that; “when a remedy is given by the constitution and a forum is given by either the  Constitution itself or statute for ventilating that grievance, then it is to that forum that the  plaintiff may present his petition”. 

It is therefore my humble view that the ground 1 of the motion to quash the charges against  the third accused person because the Attorney-General has abused his office is humbly  jurisdictionally sterile because CHRAJ is the appropriate forum for an allegation of an  abuse of office by a public servant ought to be made. The ground one is jurisdictionally  dead on arrival and has no magical wand of the Biblical Jesus Christ to overcome such  death. 

THE TRIAL IS TANTAMOUNT TO AN ABUSE OF PROCESS  

Touching on the second ground on the motion to strike the charges against the third  accused person, it must be noted that; 

Abuse of process of the Court is a term generally applied to a proceeding which is wanting  in bona fides and is frivolous, vexatious or oppressive. Abuse of process can also mean  abuse of legal procedure or improper use of legal process. (Emphases mine) See the  Nigeria Supreme Court case of AMAEFULE & ANOR v. THE STATE (1988) JELR 42783 (SC) 

In the decided case of Warren v. Attorney General for Jersey [2012] A.C 22 Lord Dyson  warned that the court in determining an abuse of executive power must always strike a  balance between the public interest and that of an accused person by ensuring that  executive misconduct does not undermine public confidence in the criminal justice  system. Hence, for a stay to be granted in such a criminal case, there must be a nexus  between the wrongdoing of the executive and the trial such that the trial will be an affront to the public conscience. See the case of Ahmed (Rangzieb) and Ahmed (Habib) [2011]  Crim L.R 734, CA 

Should the alleged scandalous audio recording between the Attorney-General and the third  accused person be admitted into evidence and it is further established that there is a  nexus between the audio tape and the trial, the entire prosecution is likely to crumble. This  will cast a mala fide sludge on the prosecution’s case and the judex is highly likely to quash  the charges on the ground of abuse of process. 

THAT THE TRIAL STIFLES THE RIGHT OF THE ACCUSED PERSON TO HAVE A FAIR TRIAL  

The right of an accused person to fair trial is provided for under Chapter 5 of the 1992  constitution thereunder. 

It is therefore not surprising that IN RE-EFFIDUASE STOOL AFFAIRS (NO.2) ODURO  NUMAPAU, PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL HOUSE OF CHIEFS, EX-PARTE AMEYAW II (NO.  2) [1998-99] SCGLR 639, the Supreme Court stated; 

“… one of the basic principles of any civilized system of justice is that a person is entitled  to a fair trial free from prejudice. No system of justice can be effective unless a fair trial to  both sides is ensured…. This common law right to a fair trial has now been elevated to a  fundamental right under the 1992 Constitution”.  

It can be inferred that in the alleged audio recording, the respected Attorney-General was  compelling the third accused to give certain evidence in the trial. Nevertheless, Article 19  (3)(10) provides as follows; 

No person who is tried for a criminal offence shall be compelled to give evidence at the  trial. 

Indeed, the above constitutional provision supra is a longstanding haloed principle of fair  trial. It will therefore not be surprising that should the alleged audio exhibit be admitted  into evidence, the Court is likely to hold that the right of the accused person under Article  19(3)(10) has been breached. 

In conclusion, I am of the humble view that the ground 2 and 3 of the application of the  accused person are solidly grounded in law unlike ground.

I end this writeup with a holding in Kandy Vs. Government of Malaya [1962] AC 322 where  it was held that;  

“if the right to be heard is to be real right which is worth anything, it must carry with it,  right in the accused man to know the case which is made against him. He must know  which evidence has been given and what statements have been made affecting him, and  then he must be given a fair opportunity to correct or contradict them”. 

 

Tags: Ato ForsonGodfred DameIn Re Ato Forson & 2 Others; A critical examination of the application by Counsel for the third accused to quash criminal charges -  M. B. YeboahM.B. Yeboah
No Result
View All Result

Highlights

Gov’t Reopens Talks With PayPal to Restore Full Service Access in Ghana

Financial Sector Assets up 34.6% in 2024 to GHS 525.59 Billion

Banking Sector Soundness Remains Robust in 2024 Amid Strong Profitability, Adequate Capital Buffers

Sha’Carri Richardson Withdraws from US Trials Following Arrest

From Singuluma to El Kaabi: Can CHAN 2024 Unleash the Next Hat-trick Hero?

Ghana to Welcome King’s Baton Relay on August 8 Ahead of 2026 Commonwealth Games

Trending

Features

Parliament Adjourns Sine Die After Intense Legislative Session Marked by Reform Calls and Tributes

August 2, 2025

Parliament Adjourns Sine Die After Intense Legislative Session Marked by Reform Calls and Tributes Parliament has adjourned...

GACL Terminates Evatex Revenue Assurance Contract Amid OSP Probe

August 2, 2025

Cyber Security Authority Flags Rising Mobile Data Scam, Cautions Public

August 2, 2025

Gov’t Reopens Talks With PayPal to Restore Full Service Access in Ghana

August 2, 2025
Bank of Ghana

Financial Sector Assets up 34.6% in 2024 to GHS 525.59 Billion

August 2, 2025

Who we are?

NORVANREPORTS.COM |  Business News, Insurance, Taxation, Oil & Gas, Maritime News, Ghana, Africa, World

NorvanReports is a unique data, business, and financial portal aimed at providing accurate, impartial reporting of business news on Ghana, Africa, and around the world from a truly independent reporting and analysis point of view.

© 2020 Norvanreports – credible news platform.
L: Hse #4 3rd Okle Link, Baatsonaa – Accra-Ghana T:+233-(0)26 451 1013 E: news@norvanreports.com info@norvanreports.com
All rights reserved we display professionalism at all stages of publications

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Business
    • Agribusiness
    • Aviation
    • Energy
    • Insurance
    • Manufacturing
    • Real Estate
    • Maritime
    • Tourism
    • Transport
    • Banking & Finance
    • Trade
    • Markets
  • Economy
  • Reports
  • Technology
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cyber-security
    • Social Media
    • Tech-guide
    • Telecom
  • Features
    • Interviews
    • Opinions
  • Lifestyle
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
    • Travel
    • Environment
    • Weather
  • NRTV
    • Audio
    • Video

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
NORVANREPORTS.COM | Business News, Insurance, Taxation, Oil & Gas, Maritime News, Ghana, Africa, World
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.